Federer – Sandgren : Anatomy of a miracle
- 28 Jan 2020
Of course, Sandgren would have been exhausted following his epic encounter against Fabio Fognini in the fourth round, but it was Federer who looked down and out and was clearly nursing injury before mounting his comeback.
With so many of the so-called ‘Next Generation’ young tennis brigade waiting in the wings to knock the ‘Big Three’ of their perch in the coming years, this may have been Sandgren’s one big opportunity to make a Grand Slam semi-final. So how did it all go wrong?
In Mats Wilander’s post-match analysis for Eurosport, Federer won because he ‘refuses to retire’ and simply had too many options in his game even when limping around the court to outfox Sandgren with different serves, spins and variety to place doubt in a nervous opponent’s mind. Crucially, for Wilander, the key for Federer was not to take risks and keep the ball in play, as typified in saving match point number 5, with Sandgren being too cautious and Federer opting to steal into the net and put away the forehand volley.
"I don't know if I've seen a bigger miracle on a tennis court"
Mats Wilander was shocked that @RogerFederer managed to complete an unbelievable comeback
— Eurosport UK (@Eurosport_UK) January 28, 2020
What may also irk Sandgren somewhat when he does come to look back upon this defeat, if indeed he can bring himself to, is the fact that he had four Federer second serves to look at.
And, although the Swiss is a master of spin and placement, he certainly had a good look at a couple of them and perhaps could have done more with the return, or taken more of a gamble.
“He played them well. Obviously he played them well,” said Sandgren in the post-match press conference. “I could have played them better. I’ve run through them a bunch of times. He was aggressive on one, passive on a few, came in on one, could have put the volley in a different spot. He read it well, hit two good passes. Put me in an awkward spot on the last one I had. Missed the approach. He probably would have passed me anyway. It was in a bad spot. Yeah, you know, all credit to him for sure.”
Tennys Sandgren match points:
#1 Backhand unforced error (7th shot)
#2 Forehand unforced error (9th shot)
#3 Forehand unforced error (3rd shot)
#4 Backhand unforced error (19th shot)
#5 Missed backhand return
#6 Federer volley winner
#7 Backhand unforced error (19th shot)
— Ben Rothenberg (@BenRothenberg) January 28, 2020
This tweet by the American journalist Ben Rothenberg from The New-York Times is spectacular. It is more than that with those details : on the 7 points played, Federer shot the ball 39 times : no unforced error and 1 winner was enough to make the miracle happen.
The older players also know how to play a three out of five set match, take injury time-outs when they matter and generally know how to play the important situations as a match evolves.
The miracle man.
— ATP Tour (@atptour) January 28, 2020
So, one can also say it’s also down to experience, and after all, this is Roger Federer we’re talking about. Not just another player who has pulled off a miracle of an upset. Just one of the greatest of all time doing what he does best on the biggest stage of all. Not that Sandgren will take any comfort from that.
When asked whether he could have done anything differently, Sandgren was measured in his response.
“Maybe go for a backhand cross-court full power. Probably had eight or nine that I played pretty good, but maybe I could have opened it up a little bit more. I was hitting my backhand well the whole day. Maybe I could have done more with that.”
What’s the rule here folks- a double shot for each match point you didn’t convert?
— Tennys Sandgren (@TennysSandgren) January 28, 2020
Lonely walk isn'it? Sandgren was so close, didn't do many wrong things during the match. But luck was not by his side. Still. an amazing run in Melbourne. pic.twitter.com/DfVvaBXx1J
— TENNISMEDIA (@luciahoff) January 28, 2020